Kodiak Daily Mirror - Kodiak News
Ahead of vote, borough advances with long-term care facility
by James Brooks/ editor@kodiakdailymirror.com
Nov 21, 2012 | 126 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
As Kodiakans head out to do their Christmas shopping, the Kodiak Island Borough is considering a gift to Kodiak’s future senior citizens.

Five days before Christmas, the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will vote on whether or not to approve a 22-bed, $16.5 million long-term care facility next to Providence Kodiak Island Medical Center.

The facility is a nursing home in all but name, though it could be used by someone suffering from an injury that requires extensive rehabilitation.

Thanks to the state’s complicated system for certifying new medical centers, paperwork for the new facility is already moving forward more than a month before the assembly has its official say.

Alaska law requires new or expanded medical facilities to obtain a “certificate of need,” a piece of paperwork that states the new facility is needed and doesn’t conflict with an existing facility.

“We have thresholds for CONs, so if somebody can build something under $1.4 million, they don't need a CON, except if it's a nursing home bed expenditure,” said Karen Lawfer, the state’s CON coordinator in Juneau.

The Kodiak Island Borough submitted its CON paperwork on Nov. 9, and anyone intending to compete with the borough’s long-term care facility has until Dec. 4 to submit a letter of intent in order to be considered along with the borough.

No such competitor is likely, but it’s the first step in a review process that may stretch to April, Lawfer said.

Interim borough manager Bud Cassidy said that even though the borough is pressing ahead with planning and paperwork, the assembly would be able to stop the project on Dec. 20 with few consequences.

Three items are scheduled for vote on that date: a contract with Providence Health and Services, which will operate the center; approval of $16.5 million in public bonds to pay for construction; and a construction contract.

“If the assembly shoots down any of those, it would be a no-go,” Cassidy said.

Contact Mirror editor James Brooks at editor@kodiakdailymirror.com.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
The Kodiak Daily Mirror encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.
Search Our Marketplace
or Search by category